\n1<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the study topic unique?<\/td>\n | o Not research (0 points)
\no Partially research (2 points)
\no Research (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n2<\/strong><\/td>\n| Does the title of the study reflect the content and methodology of the study?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n3<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the purpose of the study and\/or the research question and hypotheses, if any, clearly stated?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n4<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are the people included in the study specified (inclusion or exclusion criteria, if any)?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n5<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the place, time, design (type of study) specified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n6<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the study design appropriate for the purpose of the study?<\/td>\n | o Not applicable (0 points)
\no Partially appropriate (2 points)
\no Fully compliant (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n7<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the population, sample size and sampling method specified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n8<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the data collection method of the study specified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n9<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are the (dependent-independent) variables of the study specified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n10<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are the statistical methods used in the study specified?<\/td>\n | o Not applicable (0 points)
\no Partially appropriate (2 points)
\no Fully compliant (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n11<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are the findings written in line with the objectives of the research?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n12<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are the findings presented in an understandable way, including the results of statistical analysis?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n13<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are potential sources of bias and\/or limitations of the study identified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n14<\/strong><\/td>\n| Have recommendations been made based on the study results?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n15<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the study clearly written?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n16<\/strong><\/td>\n| What is the contribution of the study to public health?<\/td>\n | o No contribution (0 points)
\no Limited contribution (5 points)
\no Contributes (10 points) o Contributes a lot (25 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tab][vc_tab title=”QUALITATIVE RESEARCH EVALUATION CRITERIA” tab_id=”1632652344498-3-9″][vc_custom_heading text=”QUALITATIVE RESEARCH EVALUATION CRITERIA” font_container=”tag:h3|font_size:23|text_align:left|color:%230a0a0a” google_fonts=”font_family:Montserrat%3Aregular%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal” text_transform=”text-uppercase” show_border=”yes” css=”.vc_custom_1664524297702{margin-top: 9px !important;margin-bottom: 9px !important;margin-left: 30px !important;}”][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1664886845312{margin-left: 20px !important;}”]<\/p>\n \n\n\n1<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the study topic unique?<\/td>\n | o Not research (0 points)
\no Partially research (2 points)
\no Research (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n2<\/strong><\/td>\n| Does the title of the study reflect the content and methodology of the study?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n3<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the method(s) chosen in the research (focus group and\/or in-depth interview and\/or document analysis etc.) explained?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n4<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the number of people to participate in the study and the sampling method explained?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n5<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are the selection criteria for participants and how they were selected specified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n6<\/strong><\/td>\n| Who conducted the interviews and the experience of the interviewees?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n7<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the place and duration of the meetings specified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, exactly (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n8<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is sufficient information provided about the equipment used for data collection (semi-structured, unstructured, etc.)?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, concretely (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n9<\/strong><\/td>\n| How many people and how the data were coded (manually or in a specific program)?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, concretely (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n10<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the type of analysis specified (such as theme analysis)?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, concretely (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n11<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the findings section of the study adequate in terms of its objectives?<\/td>\n | o Not applicable (0 points)
\no Partially Adequate (2 points)
\no Adequate (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n12<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are potential sources of bias and\/or limitations of the study identified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, concretely (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n13<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are the results based on the research findings?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (Conclusions not based on findings) (2 points)
\no Yes, all evidence-based (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n14<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are new questions, constructive suggestions or planned actions raised by the research indicated?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (2 points)
\no Yes (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n15<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the study clearly written?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Yes, partially (2 points)
\no Yes, concretely (5 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n16<\/strong><\/td>\n| What is the contribution of the study to public health?<\/td>\n | o No contribution (0 points)
\no Limited contribution (5 points)
\no Contributes (10 points)
\no Contributes a lot (25 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tab][vc_tab title=”EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SUBMISSIONS OTHER THAN THE ORGINAL RESEARCH” tab_id=”1632652316251-2-1″][vc_custom_heading text=”EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SUBMISSIONS OTHER THAN THE ORGINAL RESEARCH” font_container=”tag:h3|font_size:23|text_align:left|color:%230a0a0a” google_fonts=”font_family:Montserrat%3Aregular%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal” text_transform=”text-uppercase” show_border=”yes” css=”.vc_custom_1664538334861{margin-top: 9px !important;margin-bottom: 9px !important;margin-left: 30px !important;}”][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1660640116138{margin-left: 20px !important;}”]*<\/strong> Field Practices and Experiences, Policy Assessments, Evaluations on the Main Theme of the Congress<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1660640453566{margin-left: 20px !important;}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n1<\/strong><\/td>\n| Has the public health importance of the issue been explained?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (5 points)
\no Yes (10 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n2<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the current literature on the subject, including national and\/or international practices, covered?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (5 points)
\no Yes (10 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n3<\/strong><\/td>\n| Has the relevant historical process been evaluated?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (5 points)
\no Yes (10 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n4<\/strong><\/td>\n| Have relevant parties\/institutions etc. been identified or assessed?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (5 points)
\no Yes (10 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n5<\/strong><\/td>\n| Have the relevant assessments been sufficiently discussed?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (5 points)
\no Yes (10 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n6<\/strong><\/td>\n| Are solution proposals and\/or research needs related to the issue specified?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (5 points)
\no Yes (10 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n7<\/strong><\/td>\n| Is the issue important for public health?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (5 points)
\no Yes (10 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n8<\/strong><\/td>\n| Does the Submission have the value to be presented and discussed at the congress?<\/td>\n | o No (0 points)
\no Partially (5 points)
\no Yes (10 points)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tab][\/vc_tour][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [vc_row wrap_container=”yes” css=”.vc_custom_1653659318003{margin-bottom: 20px !important;padding-top: 0px !important;padding-bottom: 0px !important;background-image: url(http:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/bant_header.png?id=4481) !important;}”][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Submission Evaluation Criteria” font_container=”tag:h3|font_size:25|text_align:left|color:%23ffffff” google_fonts=”font_family:Montserrat%3Aregular%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal” text_transform=”text-uppercase” css=”.vc_custom_1660639637451{margin-top: 9px !important;margin-bottom: 9px !important;margin-left: 30px !important;}”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_tour skin=”primary” type=”tabs-navigation”][vc_tab show_icon=”yes” icon_skin=”primary” title=”QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH EVALUATION CRITERIA” tab_id=”ed4be484-d23f-6″][vc_custom_heading text=”QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH EVALUATION CRITERIA” font_container=”tag:h3|font_size:23|text_align:left|color:%230a0a0a” google_fonts=”font_family:Montserrat%3Aregular%2C700|font_style:700%20bold%20regular%3A700%3Anormal” text_transform=”text-uppercase” show_border=”yes” css=”.vc_custom_1664538837656{margin-top: 9px !important;margin-bottom: 9px !important;margin-left: 30px !important;}”][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1664886834642{margin-left: 20px !important;}”] 1 Is the study […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3142","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3142"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5129,"href":"https:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3142\/revisions\/5129"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uhsk.org\/2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}} | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |